{"id":1732,"date":"2024-04-23T21:16:51","date_gmt":"2024-04-23T21:16:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/harrisonsedconsulting.com\/?p=1732"},"modified":"2024-05-18T20:46:59","modified_gmt":"2024-05-18T20:46:59","slug":"is-ediscovery-a-stain-on-our-legal-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/harrisonsedconsulting.com\/index.php\/2024\/04\/23\/is-ediscovery-a-stain-on-our-legal-system\/","title":{"rendered":"Is eDiscovery a \u201cstain on our legal system\u201d?"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"1732\" class=\"elementor elementor-1732\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-d8a786a elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"d8a786a\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-no\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-bce4975\" data-id=\"bce4975\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-330f50f1 elementor-widget elementor-widget-wp-widget-custom_html\" data-id=\"330f50f1\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"wp-widget-custom_html.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"textwidget custom-html-widget\"><div class=\"qoute-block\">\r\n                                    <p>Everyone knows that headlines are meant to sensationalise so that you read the article. Well, I saw the headline and read <a href=\"http:\/\/www.legaltechnews.com\/id=1202732652593\/EDiscovery-a-Stain-on-the-Legal-System?kw=E-Discovery%20a%20%E2%80%98Stain%E2%80%99%20on%20the%20Legal%20System&amp;et=editorial&amp;bu=Law%20Technology%20News&amp;cn=20150721&amp;src=EMC-Email&amp;pt=Afternoon%20Update&amp;slreturn=20150622081208&amp;LikelyCookieIssue=true\"> this article <\/a> only to find the headline was a direct comment from Logikcull CEO Andy Wilson. This, from the CEO of a company<a href=\"logikcull.com\/blog\/logikcull-wins-best-ediscovery-hosting-provider-at-legal-tech-innovation-awards\/\"> company who has just been awarded Best eDiscovery Hosting Provider  at West Coast Legal Tech. <\/a>\r\n\r\nI have read Andy\u2019s comments contained in an open letter to \u201chonourable practitioners of the law\u201d and apart from the \u201cstain\u201d comment, he writes, \u201cIt forces swift settlements, delays justice, cheats clients and enrages judges\u201d Wow, if this were true would you want to win \u201cBest eDiscovery hosting provider?\r\n\r\nLet me first declare my position. I do not manufacture nor sell nor use any eDiscovery software solution. I act as an independent eDiscovery Consultant based in South Africa and I \u201csell\u201d my time, expertise, experience and global contacts to assist law firms and corporations in their eDiscovery matters.\r\n\r\nAfter publishing these words, Andy has \u201cback tracked\u201d a little by complaining about \u201c..waste, inefficiency, antiquated workflows, extreme cost, poor technology...\u201d and commented that he feels the discovery process can be made better. That has always been the case as the technology has continuously evolved to make the discovery process better. The trouble is that to an extent the damage has already been done and these comments are exactly that, \u201cback tracking\u201d.\r\n\r\nLooking at some of the original comments, firstly, eDiscovery technology was born, has developed, and continues to do so because of the proliferation of electronic data. The eDiscovery industry did not create emails, spreadsheets, Word docs, embedded files, Social Media etc. nor has it done anything to increase the ever growing volumes in the world. What it has done is reacted to these and produced solutions which have had, and will continue to have, positive effects on litigation, investigations, Competition cases and the like. It has \u201cfound\u201d documents which clever people have used technology to hide. It has markedly reduced the cost of litigation etc. by avoiding the previous practice of \u201ceyes on\u201d review of every document. It has materially assisted Judges in many countries of the world, many of whom are now great advocates for its use. eDiscovery hastens rather than delays justice. I have been in Court when our side was using laptops and the other side wheeled in 100\u2019s of boxes of paper. Guess which side not only received a rebuke and costs penalty from the Judge but which corporate client commented \u201cWhy can\u2019t my side use technology\u201d? But, Andy is not really saying, \u201cDon\u2019t use eDiscovery technology\u201d, he is saying, \u201cUse my eDiscovery technology\u201d. All of this may well be a simple marketing ploy and it is up to the market, in the USA, to determine whether it is successful or not. I say USA, because my understanding is that Logikcull is cloud based and therefore may have some issues on Data Protection elsewhere in the world. Of course, I may be wrong. I haven\u2019t seen the solution but I have to say that comments such as the ones I have read do not actually encourage to me to do so, but then Andy does not have to sell it to me.\r\nManufacturing software that is as serious as it has to be to deal with the law and to keep up with the changes, volumes and complexity of data, is clearly expensive. That software is then licensed to service providers who have to provide a secure infrastructure and highly skilled people to operate it and to run cases for clients. All of the above has to be done in a completely defensible manner. These are businesses, just like Logikcull, and the purpose of running a business is to make a profit. In my 15 years in this industry I can say that it is only the increased volumes and complexity that has increased the costs of eDiscovery. If Logikcull has a different charging model than others, then, well done and good luck to them but \u201crubbishing\u201d the competition and using words like \u201cstain\u201d \u201ccheat\u201d, \u201cwaste\u201d, \u201cweaponised\u201d etc. is hardly what you might call professional marketing. I was always taught to sell by your own good values rather than by being negative about your competitors.\r\n\r\nSo, let me repeat that I have no axe to grind here. On the contrary, I welcome, as I have done for 15 years, improvements in eDiscovery technology especially if they not only add value by solving new issues but also drive down costs. Whilst mentioning costs in litigation, let us all know that the <a href=\"Getting rid of what you don\u2019t want | E-Discovery Consulting\">highest cost in a litigation case is the cost of review <\/a>(probably 70% on average) and not the cost of eDiscovery technology.\r\n\r\nIf you refer to my blog about choosing your eDiscovery provider  you will see that I recommend you look at so many things before deciding. The technology and its features and functionality; its speed of processing; how easy it is for you to use; the track record and financial record of the provider; where it is hosted; the skills and qualifications of the people supporting the technology and working with you; and of course, the cost. I stand by all that I wrote. In my 15 years so far in the industry I have seen solutions come and go and I am sure this will always be the case.\r\n\r\nBack to Andy and Logikcull, I repeat my congratulations on winning the award at LegalTech and my view now, as a past and present businessman and also as a person who is passionate about this industry, would be go out and sell Logikcull for all of the right reasons. Was I angry or upset to read Andy\u2019s comments? No, but I was sure as hell disappointed.<\/p>\r\n                                <\/div><\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1732","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/harrisonsedconsulting.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/harrisonsedconsulting.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/harrisonsedconsulting.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harrisonsedconsulting.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harrisonsedconsulting.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1732"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/harrisonsedconsulting.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1732\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2793,"href":"https:\/\/harrisonsedconsulting.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1732\/revisions\/2793"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/harrisonsedconsulting.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harrisonsedconsulting.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harrisonsedconsulting.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}